1) Given the finalists for Prez and VP, the growing gender gap in higher education, and changing demographics, we will never see four white males as finalists in the future.
2) I will never write a shorter post.
1) Given the finalists for Prez and VP, the growing gender gap in higher education, and changing demographics, we will never see four white males as finalists in the future.
2) I will never write a shorter post.
Just returned from the Olympia High School Girls Swimming Parents Meeting. My 57 MA students from this summer would have enjoyed a big chuckle if they could have been there.
Some context. A few weeks ago, one of my teaching partners challenged our students to think through the pros and cons of corporate sponsorship of public school athletics and academics. A spirited debated ensued with intelligent arguments on both sides. I sat in silence which was remarkable because I believe very strongly that public schools should be as free of corporate sponsorship and logos as absolutely possible. Most of my world is gray, this is an exception.
School attendance is compulsory so students are a captive audience. Why should we help corporations build brand loyalty as soon as possible? I also believe some corporations want to squash debate about the merits of free market capitalism. Try developing a thoughtful, rigorous social studies program in that environment. How will we ensure a vibrant democracy if our youngest citizens aren’t challenged to consider the advantages and disadvantages of free-market capitalism?
Near the end of the debate, my colleague turned to me and asked me to weigh in. An impassioned rant ensued. By the looks on their faces, I’m guessing half were inspired to think about it in new ways and half wondered what type of institution grants an insane person tenure.
Flash forward to tonight’s meeting. Damn if the first handout didn’t have an effin’ swoosh on the bottom of it. Shortly after coming to grips with that, I learn Nike has been given the team’s suit, cap, t-shirt, and sweats bidness in an “amazing deal”. The “spirit package” (suit and cap) is only $55. So maybe we’re saving five to ten dollars.
I’m guessing I might have been the only parent in the crowded room that immediately started wondering what does Nike get for their $5-$10. What are the trade-offs?
The Quakers have this great concept that if you feel compelled by “that of God within you” to say something in a meeting you have an obligation to the group to do so. I didn’t feel obligated to the group since I didn’t know many of the people, but I knew I’d be upset with myself on the drive home if I didn’t speak out.
So here’s the jest of what I said, “I know the cost to swim has gone up this year, the economy is poor, and people are hurting, and so the savings matter, but I for one would rather pay a little more to not advertise for Nike. [The coach, a friend who I assisted last year, had more of a “Ron you’re insane” look on his face, but I pressed on.] The students are a captive audience, and I think we should think through what Nike is getting out of ‘our great deal'”. The wonderful senior captain tried to alleviate my concern by spinning the deal. In turn I encouraged her and her teammates to think critically and decide whether they want to advertise for Nike.
A few minutes later a parent said, “I for one just want to thank you for finding a good deal.” In other words, go back under the rock from which you emerged.
It’s moments like that when I have to really fight cynicism because I think if parents don’t challenge their kids to think through decisions like that, critical thinking is an impossibility, and without critical thinking, can we really maintain a vibrant democracy?
One other parent complimented the “eloquent” way I expressed myself, but I suspect she was questioning my sanity at the same time.
When I got home I learned this wasn’t an isolated incident. Olympia High School is now a “Nike-school”.
Here’s my question to “great deal” swimming parent. Where do you suggest we draw the line? Why not a Reebok middle school and a Puma elementary school with free Usain Bolt “I enjoy reading” posters? I’m sure we could get more and more corporate sponsorships to subsidize more and more of public school costs. You want lower property taxes, then fine, let’s plaster billboards on school busses. Let’s return to Channel One televised news with Skittles commercials every 90 seconds. Let’s sell football stadium naming rights to the highest bidder whether they’re a good corporate citizen or not. Let’s sell computer lab rights to Intel and plaster a placard on the door.
If we get creative, we can probably avoid paying any property taxes. Then we’ll have more than enough money to go buy more sports shit with swooshes all over it.
Housing crisis, foreclosures, financial institutions teetering on the brink. Say you’re about to lose your house, forget walking away from it. Offer it to NIKE or some other corporation. They’d probably assume half the liability and half the payments in exchange for painting giant swooshes on the roof, garage doors, and sides of the house. Housing crisis averted. No harm done.
Running a little low on cash, get branded. I’m guessing Nike would pay you $1,000 to have the swoosh tatooed on the back of your neck. That is unless you’re a public school teacher and around 150 kids, 180 days a year, in which case I’m guessing they’d double it.
I’m a bit conflicted about the Olympics. That shouldn’t come as a surprise to regular readers since that’s true about nearly everything. I can’t help but wonder who is on the juice, the rampant country swapping makes it less compelling, and then there’s the nationalism (we’re superior because our athletes are better?) and incessant commercials. Then again, I’m a sports junkie so I do my best to suppress those thoughts, mute the commercials, and embrace the competition and drama.
I admit to being a bit nostalgic for when amateurs predominated, but despite the recent changes, the Olympics are still pretty cool. People from all over the globe getting to know one another while competing, not fighting.
Hodgepodge of thoughts from week one:
• Second lowest point. When Fox News interviewed some general following the lowest point, the tragic murder-suicide on day one. Fox News “journalist”: Should Americans be fearful? Should they be concerned for their safety? Should they take precautions? American General: Absolutely, yada, yada, yada. Unbelievable unfounded fear-mongering. In essence he was suggesting that any Americans that dared visit China were unsafe and that similar attacks could easily happen at any time to other visitors. I couldn’t help but wonder if he had ever spent any time in China. I’ve spent months walking and cycling through major Chinese cities by myself and have never felt unsafe. That tragedy was the result of a disturbed person. It was a random act of violence and that general (and Fox News by extension) is an embarrassment.
• I dig the cycling path along the rowing venue. The Chinese are racing to abandon their bikes for motorcycles and cars, but I think those cyclist add a nice traditional touch to the rowing events.
• I double dig the marathon rallies in women’s badminton.
• The women’s road race looped around the Great Wall at Badaling. When I hiked up to the Great Wall at Badaling Lionel Ritchie music was being piped in through cheap speakers tied to tree branches. Nothing personal LR, but that definitely took away from the experience.
• Michael Phelps. Genetic advantages (size of feet-superior dolphin kick, lung capacity-can stay underwater longer, wing span) plus a world class work ethic plus mental toughness plus excellent coaching/preparation. The world records are the result of the suit, which apparently save .5 seconds per 60. He beat Spitz by 12 seconds in the 200 free! The key question for me, that I haven’t heard anyone else raise, is will his success lead to an upsurge in the number of young competitive swimmers in the U.S., ala Frank Shorter and running in the 70’s. Hope so, it’s a great sport. Other Phelps question, where will he end up among countries in the medal count? I read he earns $5m/year right now from sponsors, but that’s expected to jump to $30m/year. I predict school children will be writing reports about Phelps 100 years from now.
• Chinese gymnasts, average height 4’9”, average weight 77lbs. Those are some short, light, young looking 16 year olds.
• Disappointed with the lack of cultural teaching and learning. Missed opportunity it seems. I thought the commentary during the opening ceremonies was good (except for the bizarre “note the precision of their hands even when working at McDonalds or Starbucks”), but among many others, there are two important themes that have been slighted. 1) The two Chinas, the urban, wealthier, eastern portion of the country that makes up about 25% of the total and the rural, poorer, western portion that makes up about 75% of the total. The first China tends to get 90% of the coverage. 2) The incredible population density in the eastern portion of the country where the Olympics are taking place.
• When is golf going to be added? If there’s not room there’s always synchronized swimming.
• Usain Bolt. . . clean? I said I’m TRYING to suppress cynical thoughts like that.
Last in a series.
A letter I might send young athletes and their families if I was a youth coach.
Dear Families and Athletes:
I’m looking forward to the upcoming season and the opportunity it will provide to get to know each of you better. I’m writing to share a few core beliefs that shape my approach to practicing, competing, and youth sports more generally. I’m interested in your ideas and invite you to share them with me as well.
I believe athletic excellence is a means to several important ends, not an end in itself. In ten or twenty years, few if any people will remember our won-loss record this season or who had the most points. In my coaching I take a broader view and continually ask myself: how can the ways we practice, interact, and compete help you become healthier, happier, more self-confident 22 and 32 year-olds?
Even though I do not intend on focusing narrowly on our won-loss record, we will practice with purpose and compete hard. I believe a commitment to athletic excellence serves several purposes. For instance, it will help you develop a positive work ethic, which will pay dividends in school, at work, and in your personal lives.
Also, as we practice with purpose and compete hard, your skills we improve; as a result, you’ll enjoy the activity even more and develop greater self-confidence that will spill over into other areas of your life. Among other benefits, self confidence can serve as a powerful check on negative peer pressure.
Also, as adolescents and young adults, you’ll routinely work in small groups in school, in the workplace, and in your personal lives. This season will provide important lessons on how to positively contribute to group goals, how to persevere and problem solve when the going gets tough, and how to share responsibility for both positive and negative outcomes.
Additionally, everyone who commits to athletic excellence eventually learns that there’s some team that is better than them. This reality teaches humility and compassion for those competitors who fall short of their goals, sensibilities that will help you become more caring adolescents and young adults.
Lastly, I want you to have so much fun this season you pester your parents to sign you up again next season. I want to help you become good friends and develop positive attitudes towards our sport and exercise more generally. More broadly, I want to plant the seeds of a life-long commitment to fitness.
So I’m taking the long-view, focusing on the forest that is the next ten to twenty years rather than the trees that are winning any particular game, a league championship, or a state title. I’m hopeful that you’ll learn to compete and you’ll experience athletic success this season, but even more importantly, you’ll take a few more steps towards becoming hard working, self-confident, caring young adults who are healthy, happy, and dedicated to making your communities better places.
Sincerely,
Coach Byrnes
Third in a series. I acknowledge that I’m generalizing, focusing on the 51% of parent, coach, and youth sport activity that I believe constitutes mania. There are lots of parents who sit mostly in silence and show excellent sportsmanship on the sidelines, cheering excellent play, irrespective of the color of the jerseys. The same parents praise their children’s effort whether they fill up the stat sheet or not and offer them constructive criticism in a private, caring way. And there are excellent coaches who focus on the forest that is their athletes’ long-term health and development.
But too often it seems, those coaches and parents seem to be overshadowed by the coaches and parents that become unhinged by single-minded competitiveness. I’m not sure why I have let those coaches and parents ruffle my feathers so much.
The end result of the ruffling is that for all practical purposes I have opted out of youth sports. To L’s dismay at times, I’ve chosen not to coach, I have purposely not pushed my daughters, and I watch their games passively, alienated from the most anxious and vocal parents.
Yes, I have considered that I’m too analytical, that I should just chill, and go along to get along, but I accept that I often think about things differently.
Youth sports, like the arts, like schooling, like religious youth groups, have so much potential for good, but too often, coaches and parents focus too exclusively on winning and squander that potential. When children take the field, too many parents think of them as extensions of themselves. If their kid plays poorly it reflects negatively on them; if they excel, it reflects positively on them.
Sure, it’s possible I overcompensated, but that’s water under the bridge. Maybe I should have had higher expectations and worked with A and J one-on-one more. If I had, maybe they would have experienced even more success and enjoyed playing even more. I guess I was waiting for them to take the initiative to practice by themselves or with friends outside of the schedules predetermined by adults, or to ask me for help, or both.
Outside of school, my friends and I played all the time without having to because we wanted to. Rain, snow, searing heat, the setting sun, nothing stopped us. We’d work on our putting and jump shots under a flood light and the rain meant after school football would be that much more fun. I routinely played 9 or 18 holes of golf by myself. If my daughters are representative of today’s generation of young athletes, they play when they’re told to, which begs the question, do they play mostly as a result of adult expectations? And would the youngest athletes have even more fun if left to their own devices?
Richard Williams, father of Venus and Serena Williams, is an odd bird, but he did something as a tennis coach of his young daugthers that I think was brilliant. Once a year he’d take their racquets and hide them in a closest in their Compton, CA house to see how they’d react. He’d do this as a check on whether they were developing an intrinsic love of the game. Apparently, they’d take one day off and then begin tearing the house apart on day two.
What percentage of our young athletes is developing a genuine fondness for their activities of choice? What would happen if the adults didn’t organize their leagues, didn’t unfurl their lawn chairs on the sidelines of their games, didn’t watch their every move two nights a week, and didn’t affirm their every effort?
Part two in a series. Unless we attempt to understand why parents sign up their four year olds for organized soccer, we’ll never fundamentally reform youth sports.
I may have stumbled upon the beginning of an answer a year later when I was teaching A to ride her bike without training wheels for the first time. As she gleefully weaved down the middle of the street trying to figure out how to stop, another father of a child A’s age watched from inside his house. The next day I saw him struggling to teach his five year old to ride his bike sans training wheels. Never mind that children develop at different rates and that some four year olds hop on their bikes and leave some six and seven year olds in their dust. Dammit, his kid wasn’t going to be left behind by that Byrnes girl.
If the kid next door is riding her bike and she’s playing soccer, and my child isn’t, it’s just a matter of time before that kid is in the highest reading and math groups in elementary school, on the select teams, in the honors courses in middle school, on Varsity and in the Advanced Placement courses in high school. Ultimately, if my kid doesn’t start riding his/her bike and playing soccer when other kids do, they won’t make it into colleges that are as selective as the other kids undoubtedly will, and then of course, there’s grad school.
I digress, back to the inaugural tiny tot soccer practice. Before leaving for it, I rolled up the newly arrived issue of Sports Illustrated (ala John Wooden) and jammed it into my back pocket. I intended on using it as a shield of sorts in case any “Little League” parents showed up. I would compensate for their intensity by sitting to the side dispassionately reading SI. Interesting that I began my youth sports parent journey with that alternative, even outsider mentality, because I thought it might have evolved following A’s first practice.
Right before the practice the coach gave a great talk to the co-ed hoard of pipsqueaks about learning one another’s names and the importance of teamwork. I thought, “Cool, A’s going to have a positive first experience with a progressive coach.” But then, immediately after everyone quickly whispered their names, he threw the ball out onto the field and the pre-school athletes began “scrimmaging.”
From behind my SI, I alternated between chuckling and cringing because the scrimmage consisted of fifteen midgets chasing one speedster with natural skills. This went on and on. There were no drills, no introduction of fundamentals, and no one learned anyone’s name. There was learning going on though, fifteen children learned they weren’t nearly as good as their one teammate.
Midway through the scrimmage, A bonked heads with another runt and came running to me in tears. As I hugged her and wiped her tears, I wondered, “What the hell were we thinking?”
Fast forward to the present. A friend coaches a select soccer team and surprise, surprise, he says some parents are never content with their kid’s playing time and others, immediately after the game, want him to relay critical feedback to their daughters. Recently, a ref said that he “should be embarrassed” by his parents’ behavior on the sideline.
My friend didn’t elaborate on what prompted the comment, but I can picture the scene, some of the parents barking at their kid, or hectoring opposing kids, or ripping the fifteen year old ref just getting a feel for his first part-time job (as if he secretly has money in Vegas on one of the U12 girl teams). To my friend’s credit, he was embarrassed, and things have improved following a lengthy team email.
To be continued.
First in a series. I’ve done a lot of thinking about youth sports, mostly while sitting on the sidelines at my daughter’s soccer games. Just because I’ve done a lot of thinking about youth sports doesn’t mean that what follows is “the truth,” it’s simply my subjective perspective based upon my particular life experiences. I welcome opposing viewpoints and I’m curious if my perspective resonates with anyone. Like Ben Stein said in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, “Anyone? Anyone?”
Some context. I grew up playing sports all the time, switching sports with the seasons. I was decent in most every sport, but didn’t distinguish myself in any. I think positively about my sports experiences and I would describe myself as sports-minded.
I have a hunch that I may be different than most sports fans in that I tend to root for the underdog even if “my” team is favored. Between 1985-1989, I taught at four high schools in Los Angeles, one in the inner city, one in an upper middle class section of the San Fernando Valley, and two in between. When watching basketball games at the well-to-do school, I recall silently rooting for the visiting inner city teams. Similarly, if I read a compelling story about a foreign athlete before the Olympics, I’ll typically root for him/her even if they’re going head-to-head with an American.
My daughters are privileged, as are most of their teammates. Sometimes they play teams that appear to be less privileged, imperfectly measured mostly by the number of adults in attendance. Sometimes my daughters’ teams thump less privileged teams and I feel alienated from the parents who continue to cheer lustily after each successive goal. I’ve been on the other side too, having watched my daughters’ teams get spanked, and was amazed at how oblivious the other parents were to the larger context as they cheered wildly for goal eight, nine, ten.
My first youth sports experience as a parent was unequivocally negative. L and I signed up A, at age four, for soccer. Good thing I have a modest blog readership because that’s a difficult admission. If three seconds ago you didn’t stop and say to yourself, “What the hell were they thinking signing up their four year old daughter for organized soccer?” you should have. And in case you didn’t, I will, “What the hell were we thinking signing up our four year old for organized soccer?”
I guess the sad truth of the matter is we did it because we were human lemmings mindlessly following the lead of our peers. I’m not proud of that, but at least I’m owning up to it.
Stay tuned.
My dad was a successful executive. In contrast, I’ve been content to work with students in high school and college classrooms. I don’t think I have any fatal flaws that would spell administrative disaster; I just haven’t felt the call of administration. Recently though, I’ve agreed to coordinate our Masters Program with Teacher Certification for the next three years.
L, far from objective of course, says she’s certain I will be successful. I appreciate her confidence.
I’ve worked with a gaggle of administrators, some who were effective that I respected, others that made you wonder how on earth they rose to their positions of leadership. I’ve reflected on all of their strengths and weaknesses; as a result, I have leadership intuitions that that I’m sure I’ll refine over the next three years. Maybe my goal should be for no one to mutter, “How on earth did Byrnes become Program Coordinator?”
Given my new responsibilities, I read a recent Wall Street Journal bio about a technology CEO a bit more closely than normal. One year older than me at 47, his leadership philosophy consisted of three things: work hard, treat people well, and listen. Love it. Substantive and simple.
Before heading out for last Sunday’s training ride, I downloaded a few podcasts including a recent CarTalk episode, a favorite Saturday morning National Public Radio program of mine.
While listening to the hosts, brothers Tom and Ray, it dawned on me that their success is also a template not just for administrative success, but workplace success more generally. The three keys to their success: know your stuff, connect with people before getting down to work, and don’t take yourself too seriously.
What do you think of these frameworks? How would you boil down the keys to successful leadership?
I was teaching in Yakima, WA last week. On the way into Yakima there’s a sign that proclaims, “Yakima, The Palm Springs of Washington.” While it’s often sunny and hot in Yakima, its self-perception is a bit skewed. I like Yakima, but it’s working class, has few golf courses and swimming pools, and according to newspaper reports, is a huge international drug hub.
Imagine if only saying it made it true. Maybe I should make some signs for my yard. “Ron Byrnes, Ironman World Champion.” “Ron Byrnes, British Open Champion.” “Ron Byrnes, Husband and Father of the Year—Again.” “Obama-Byrnes 08.”
Clearly I’ve underestimated the power of positive signage for far too long. For the Mall in D.C., “Energy Independence.” For the White House lawn, “Inspired, Enlightened Leadership.” For Wall Street, “We’re Rallying Now.” For the Seattle Mariners’ Safeco Field, “The Team to Beat.” For the Chevron station down the street, “Gas is Cheap.” For the side of McCain’s Straight Talk Express, “More Inspired, Enlightened Leadership.”
I digress. When I’m in Yakima, I run on a bike trail by a river. It’s a pretty nice vibe. Last Monday night I felt good, so I picked it up, passed the normal turnaround, a junk yard/chop shop, and kept going. The physical toll of the previous day’s drive and the psychic toll of that day’s teaching fell away as I entered into half marathon-zone, a mod-hard sustainable pace. Mid-run, drenched in sweat, I started to wonder what it would be like to be sedentary and never have the sensation of extending myself physically. Never cut wood, never do yoga, never lift weights, never run, never walk a long ways. I assume you lose touch with your physical self. I think that disconnect or “physical deadness” would be worse than the all of the negative health effects of a sedentary life combined.
Over the last fifteen years, as I’ve developed an active lifestyle, I’ve grown increasingly in-tune with my body. In the water, on my bike, running, I have a good feel for the effects of distance and geography on how hard I can push it and how long it will take my body to bounce back.
After the run, I filled my water bottle and collapsed into a chair in my hotel room. The air-conditioner revived me in short order. If pressed, I couldn’t really explain the science of the “runners high” although I know endorphins play an important part. My explanation is simpler. My runners’ high is the result of the sudden contrast between extending myself physically to an uncomfortable point and then completely stopping. Subconsciously (at least it was subconscious before I wrote this sentence), I make a deal with my body, extend yourself for x number of miles or minutes or hours and then I’ll stop, promise. That night, post run, no sedentary person on the planet could appreciate as much as I did the joy of sitting perfectly still, drinking water, watching the NewsHour. Similarly, neither could they relate to how amazing it feels to collapse in the grass in front of Enumclaw High School after cycling up, down, and around Mount Rainer.
When it comes to fitness, as I’ve written previously, people focus too narrowly on weight loss. For me, there’s a spiritual component to it. I feel more alive as a result of knowing my body. As in Yakima, I regularly push my body to the point of uncomfortableness; as a result, I’m a happier, more complete person.
I had some time today so I started the redesign way ahead of schedule. There’s more to do, but what you see is a start. New name, same plan, post on Mondays. As always, I value your input whether in person, via email, or a blog comment.
Back to Zimbabwe. In April, in Norway, I attended a talk by Namibia’s ambassador to Scandinavia (her office is in Stockholm and she travels regularly to Finland and Norway). There were probably forty of us gathered to listen to the ambassador in the small Namibian non-profit cooperative that sold Namibian goods and raised money for development projects. The ambassador summarized recent Namibian history, highlighted the progress made since Independence, and then explained Namibia’s ongoing challenges. Afterwards, she encouraged us to ask anything that was on our minds.
So after waiting for a few Namibia-specific questions to be posed, I asked, “What, if anything, can your neighboring countries and your government do to pressure Mugabe to respect his citizens’ basic human rights and reverse Zimbabwe’s tragic downward spiral?” I don’t remember every word of her response, but I vividly recall the analogy she used to explain Southern Africa’s passivity. She smiled and said, “It’s like my husband and me. We might not always get along perfectly, but when we argue we want to do so in the privacy of our home.” Most in the audience viewed that as an imminently reasonable response, but her analogy begs important questions. Is the right to personal, group, and national privacy unlimited? Or does one earn the right to privacy by upholding agreed upon international human rights? The alternative is to say it’s the rule of the jungle within our houses and the survival of the most heavily armed within our political borders and to hell with interventionist neighbors on our streets and just over our borders.
Just as our first amendment rights to freedom of expression aren’t unlimited, neither are our rights to privacy. I can’t grow marijuana in my house nor can I excuse physical abuse based upon my “right to privacy.” Mugabe has been physically abusing his citizens for a decade. Or maybe, if we extend the ambassador’s analogy, he’s just exercising his right to privacy on a national scale. Intervention obviously raises a host of challenging questions with probable complications, but we need to urgently raise the questions and confront the probable complications before more people die from starvation and political violence. How would WWII have turned out if Germany’s neighbors had upheld the German’s right to “national privacy?” How many more Rwanda’s would there have been and how many more will there be?
The most important political insight is “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” We make a mistake when we think differences in human nature explain why some nations are dysfunctional and we’re so together. We’re relatively together for one overarching reason: our constitutional system of checks and balances that limits power and minimizes corruption. Recently, a Wall Street Journal writer made a case for military intervention in Sudan, Burma, Tibet, and Zimbabwe. If I was grading his commentary, I would have assigned an “Incomplete” because he didn’t address the dilemma of what foreign military powers can do, if anything, to create conditions which will give rise to governmental institutions—specifically substantive checks and balances—that will increase the odds of troubled countries creating positive momentum. Without checks and balances, a new group of oppressors will begin surfacing as soon as the western militaries return home. Five plus years later, I do not believe Iraq has turned the corner in this regard despite a tremendous loss of American and Iraqi lives and the continuous and unsustainable expenditure of military and financial resources.