The Gerontocracy

Why do constituents vote for such elderly incumbents? Full disclosure, I’m complicit and maybe I should reword the question to why did I recently vote for such elderly incumbents, Washington State’s current senators, Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell, 75 and 67 respectively?

Maybe the answer is there weren’t similarly appealing younger candidates from which to choose. Which, of course, begs the question, why not? Why aren’t young, socially conscious, vital candidates fairing better? Is it because a larger proportion of elderly people vote and they’re more likely to vote for their peers? I dunno.

But I do know it’s time for a constitutional amendment to add an upper age limit to the lower ones. I propose Congressional and Presidential candidates must be under age 70. The likelihood of that getting approved anytime soon is about the same as the U.S. Men’s National Team winning the 2030 World Cup.

A Very Good Sentence

Mark Leibovich on Kevin McCarthy and Lindsey Graham in a funny, insightful, and important essay, “The Most Pathetic Men in America”.

“They had long been among the most supplicant super-careerists ever to play in a city known for the breed, and proved themselves to be essential lapdogs in Trump’s kennel.”

Believe Women

I’m not an elected official or quasi-public figure and have no constituents or pending election to worry about. Just one citizen, who, after listening to Christine Blasey Ford, doesn’t feel compelled to assume Kavanaugh’s innocence.

Besides, today’s hearing is not a court of law, it’s a job interview. I believe her to the point where I don’t even need or want to listen to Kavanaugh. She is an inspiration. He’s done.

To Lindsey Graham and his fellow whiney Republicans who are crying that there’s not enough time to confirm anyone before the midterms, two words. Merrick Garland.